Saturday, March 28, 2015

How many times do we use google a day? We don’t keep count, for we use it too many times to keep track of. What do we use google for? Just about everything. Google represents a sort of vast, mysterious abyss. It has the answers to everything we want to know. We don’t normally think of the power google has but the article “Journalist Who Exposes U.N. Corruption Disappears from Google” reveals google’s extraordinary control over information.

The article discusses Journalist Matthew Lee. His style is described as “clunky,” his methods as “unorthodox” and his judgment as “off the mark.” However, In the past, Lee has been a whistleblower for the U.N. He has helped in unveiling human-rights abuse by the Ugandan People’s Defense Force.

Lee was surprised when he received an email from google, after google allegedly received a complaint from a source about Lee’s small website. The assumption is that the UNDP sent the complaints. What’s strange is that after two years, this was the first time Lee was receiving complaints. Although Lee had helped the UN in the past, as a journalist, he was naturally also skeptical of the UN itself. He found that in November of 2007 the UN had not signed global human-rights and anti-censorship compacts. He questioned why they had not done this. This was not taken well by the UN.  Lee states,

"I've been covering ... U.N. stories, three to four a day, for two years, and for the last two years there's been no problem at all… Then that Friday, I received the e-mail. There's something a little skeezy here. I think that Google got involved with the U.N. on these Millennium goals and thought, this is the United Nations, if they tell you some small Web site is a thorn in their side and there's a credible reason you could remove them from your news service, you do it."

Lee’s quotation revealed how google is able to control journalism. In my last blog post I also spoke about how Jacobson had to leave google, fearing its power over his identity as a liberated and independent journalist. It’s interesting because the UN seems to be acting like complete hypocrites. They respect Lee when he’s a whistleblower in their favor, but as soon as he steps out and is critical of them, they dismiss him. Why can’t organizations accept criticism if it will make them a more ethical organization in the long run?
As I came across the article “Senator’s Attempt to Define ‘Real Journalism’ Blasted by Journalists”

I was struck by the phrase “Real Journalism.” I began to think: If there is a real journalism, is there a fake journalism? Who defines what is journalism and what is not? And then I re-read the article’s title: Senator’s Attempt to Define Real Journalism… Then I thought how can you define journalism? And what gives a senator, somebody who is not a journalist, the power to do this?

So I read the entire article, not knowing what I was getting myself into. Here’s a summary of the article: Senator Dianne Feinstein says the shield law protecting the press should only be given to real journalists. She defines a real journalist as somebody who has a salary for a journalism career. Here I challenge the senator: A journalist, by nature, should not be driven by compensation. A journalists true passion should be to seek truth and report it. In the SPJ code of ethics, the rule of ethics do not only apply only to journalists who are getting paid. By tying journalism to money, Feinstein is suggesting that news is a commodity. This is a very troubling idea because when news becomes dictated by money it is no longer news. And a journalist’s ability to report the news should not be determined by his/her paycheck.

Senator Charles Schumer makes an interesting statement challenging Feinstein’s definition of real journalism. He states, “The world has changed. We’re very careful in this bill to distinguish journalists from those who shouldn’t be protected, WikiLeaks and all those, and we’ve ensured that...But there are people who write and do real journalism, in different ways than we’re used to. They should not be excluded from this bill."

Schumer understands that we live in a world that is constantly changing, especially in terms of technology. Now everybody is able to make a blog and report on corruptions in the world. In a way we are all journalists, but of course, not everybody can be awarded a press pass. But Dianne Feinstein completely disregards the importance of independent journalists. She is stuck in the past and refuses to open her eyes to new media and the evolving identities of journalists.


Thursday, March 26, 2015

On March 24th, William A. Jacobson was invited to my Independent Media Journalism class at Ithaca College. Just to briefly summarize the class, it is devoted to exploring independent media outlets that are not tied to conglomerate companies. Independent Media outlets have the liberty to explore their own voice without fear of being punished by their employers or ridiculed by the public. An independent journalist knows that his/her opinion may not be respected by everybody-- but they still choose to publish it, encouraging debates and conversation.
Most recently we’ve been discussing bloggers, independent journalists who focus on a niche that they feel passionate about. I’ve always wanted to be a fashion blogger. In middle school I created a lookbook (http://lookbook.nu/Gabbyj) where I posted outfits. I didn’t do it frequently enough and overtime I lost interest. I’ve been wanting to get back into the habit of it, but it’s taken me awhile. It’s not difficult, I just have to take photos of what I’m wearing in some kind of creative way, but something keeps holding me back. I sometimes fear that I’ll create an unsuccessful blog. As a perfectionist, I have a plan for everything. But a blog is something that can’t be so thoroughly planned. It’s a changing medium, changing with the writer and with the world.
Jacobson gave me confidence that anybody could create a successful blog with the right mindset. He started his conservative political blog: Legal Insurrection in 2008. (http://legalinsurrection.com/.) The blog started with a conversation. He was explaining his reasons for voting for John McCain and Sarah Palin in the 2008 presidential election. The person he was speaking to was voting for Obama, but said that Jacobson’s argument was very persuasive. He gave Jacobson the idea to start a blog. Jacobson took this advice and started a blog on google, posting about 1-3 posts a day. For the first two years of the blogs existence, Jacobson was the only writer.
As time went on and he realized how much work it was to maintain a blog, he collaborated with one of his students at Cornell and she began posting onto the blog about once a week. Most posts revolved around events because these seemed to generate the most user traffic . Legal insurrection moved away from google. Jacobson revealed an email from google saying that his blog was reported as spam. They gave him a time limit to respond to the email otherwise the blog would be removed. Jacobson decided to move away from google, scared about how much power and control it had. He moved on, collaborating with a small company where he has to pay a couple hundred dollars a month. This new site features advertisements and a higher level of organization. While the blog does get most of its revenue from advertisements, it also encourages donations from readers.
Jacobson’s visit to my class taught me the importance of timeliness. A blogger, as well as any journalist, needs to constantly update the public. Jacobson said that if he were to take breaks from blogging, his site would experience a major decrease in views. People don’t want to visit sites when the information hasn’t been updated. He also said that in order to get more views, it’s a good idea for bloggers to send their links to other sites. The sites might refer back to the blog, increasing the blog’s overall audience.
Overall I learned that as a blogger, you have to be confident that there is a group out there that will respect what you have to say. As long as you are true to what you believe and you represent yourself accurately and adopt a crucial journalistic mindset and skill set, everything else will figure itself out.

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

The article “1,000 True Fans” (http://kk.org/thetechnium/2008/03/1000-true-fans/)  discusses how in order for an artist, a producer, inventor, or any individual creator needs to have 1,000 true fans in order to be successful. A true fan is a person who follows the creator, buys all of his/her merchandise, drives long distances to see him/her preform. In other words, a true fan is completely loyal to the artist, and nothing stands between the artist and the fan. This strong bond is created by technology, allowing for the artist to directly communicate with the fan. Therefore, the fan feels close to the artist.
I found the information in this article to be troubling. Yes, I think it’s important for an artist to engage with his/her audience. But the way the article describes this relationship makes it seem that it is similar to prey and predator. The artist preys on the consumer, manipulating them in a way that will transform them into a fan. I think with bloggers, it’s absolutely necessary to engage with the audience via social media and the internet. After all, these platforms are the nature of the career. Without the internet there is no blogger. But I was always baffled as to how many actors and actresses were urged to get twitter accounts. Instead of advertising their talent in films, they advertised their persona. I think this is where the separation from celebrity and artist comes from. A true artist does not need social media for talent recognition, but a celebrity needs it for attention. It is probably true, for the most part, that encouraging technology-based engagement with the audience leads to a greater financial following.
It sickens me that there are so many talented, unrecognized artists. My sister is seventeen years old. She has been in a few independent films shot by NYU tisch students. The first director was a talented student who worked with actress Quevenzhané Wallis from The Beasts of the Southern Wild, a fantastic independent film which came out in the summer of 2013. I remember when my sister showed me some of his short films, I found his shots to be romantic, with soft lighting that rendered nature so beautifully. His films haven’t gotten much attention. This is partly because he isn’t as well known. Another director my sister worked with had won an oscar and had a celebrity producer for his upcoming film. Unfortunately, I cannot give any more details because the film has not come out yet and the producer can’t be named. I’m sure this film will be great, but it will undoubtedly receive a stronger following because of its celebrity status.
Furthermore, as a blogger I think it’s appropriate to seek fans. This is what blogging is about. Without fans or followers, a blog wouldn’t gain attention. But I do not think mainstream news should be seeking fans. The news should be giving information to the whole public, not in a manner that will get more “followers” with misleading headlines and sensational information.

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

When I was in middle school, me and my friends usually hung out after school, telling each other we would grab a snack and then get straight to our homework. I suppose middle school students are all somewhat optimistic, because we never did our homework. Our time was spent procrastinating on facebook, playing the sims, and then also looking up http://www.overheardinnewyork.com/. The site consists of real things overheard in New York City. Most things are out of context, so they’re actually very funny to read. We would take turns reading them out loud, laughing at the ridiculous things people said. But there was always a curiosity that kept us reading out loud-- perhaps we would be featured on the blog without even knowing it! I think this is what is so fascinating about overhear in New York-- The entire New York City population makes up its subject matter, therefore it is possible to read something you have said on the blog. I remember reading it and thinking “Well, I could’ve said that..”
Like most blogs, Overheardinnewyork.com owes its success to its specific niche but appeals to such a large audience. Therefore, people can’t go to other news sites to get the same information. The information on the blog is unique. The title is also straight forward, communicating to its readers exactly what kind of information the blog features. It also is written entirely for its audience. Unlike mainstream news sites that do not allow for much reader participation or engagement, overheardinnewyork.com would not survive without its interactive readers. Readers are able to post what they’ve heard in New York while the staff members select ones to post onto the blog. The writers and the readers work together to create the site, creating a tight bond between the two. I think the mainstream could learn more from blogs, especially when it comes to reader engagement. The writers of mainstream outlets should be writing for their readers, but instead, many write for advertisers. The news system has become corrupt, favoring money rather than ethical principles. If the mainstream news outlets created a platform for reader participation, then mainstream news might become more trustworthy. The news is for the people, so that we can function in a society that is supposed to be democratic. When the news is filtered based on advertisements and massive corporations, we lose our identity as a democratic country.
In John Tozzi’s “Bloggers Bring in the Big Bucks,” he discusses the viral blog I Can Has Cheezburger (http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2007-07-13/bloggers-bring-in-the-big-bucksbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice).

The blog started off small, soon exploding into a site that got up to half a million hits per day. The blog features photos of cats with funny captions. It’s not a hard news blog whatsoever. It explores a very specific niche and gives people brief laughter in the midst of a rough day, during the mornings or a lunch break. It’s not that people are so invested in cat memes, but it becomes a way for people to have a place where they can escape reality for a short while. Therefore, it appeals to most people. People are always looking to escape, and the internet provides a suitable outlet for this escape. It also encourages reader interaction. Tozzi states, “Part of it has to do with the nature of the medium: Blogging creates a direct connection between authors and readers, a conversation with distinct voices carried out in comments and e-mails and other blogs...” Tozzi describes the interactive nature of blogs. This is probably what makes them so successful. Readers like to be a part of something that allows for their participation. I think what also makes blogs so successful is that they cater to a specific audience. I just started following several fashion blogs on Instagram. Most of them revolve around an individual’s personal lifestyle, including fashion, food, and travel. I usually look for people who have similar style to me or people whose style I admire. I’ve always been really interested in fashion, but I have recently become more serious about making a career out of it. Recently I read a book called How to Be Parisian Wherever You Are by a group of female Parisian friends, including Caroline De Maigret, a well known Parisian style icon. The book acts more as a blog than a novel, suggesting that blogs can take countless formats. The book offers style advice, relationship advice, etc. It describes the Parisian woman as fearless, feminist, wild, and strong. It basically describes what every woman aspires to be like. One reads the book and marvels at the depiction of the perfect woman. The book has been advertised internationally and has gained an eclectic readership. Advertised at Marc Jacobs trendy bookstore in the West Village, celebrities and fashionistas in New York City gathered for a signed copy. It has an incredibly strong following, quickly becoming a must-read in the fashion community. Because the book describes several qualities of a Parisian woman, the reader will most likely identify with a few of themselves, projecting themselves onto the woman De Maigret describes. It would be interesting to see the book transform into an online blog. Right now the book  has an Instagram and a twitter, but both act as an advertising device for the book. The book has the potential to turn into a complete sensation if it created an outlet for readers to post their own photographs and writing to the page that correlated to the book’s subject matter. This would be a successful way to keep the conversation going between women everywhere.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Free Lovers and Gender Equality

In Chapter four of Rodger Streitmatter’s Voices of Revolution titled “Promoting Free Love in the Victorian Age,” Rodger explores gender roles in marriage. In the 1860s, The Revolution questioned the institution of marriage. They called themselves free lovers because they believed that a marriage should solely be based on love. They did not think that a woman’s identity should only be based on her relationship with her husband. They wanted women to thrive independently without limitations that gender imposed.
Gender equality is a topic that is widely discussed today. In Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s infamous TED talk, she shines light on the issue (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hg3umXU_qWc).  She talks specifically about her African heritage where gender is treated as a binary. She recalls a time when she handed money to a valet parker in Lagos and instead of thanking her, the beggar looking to her male friend and thanked him. He assumed that she had not earned the money she was handing him. He believed that whatever money she did have was given to her by a man. The problem, Adichie states, is that men usually do not actively think about gender. The valet parker naturally assumed that the money was not hers because he was raised to think this way. This is where Adichie raises a solution. She says that in order to change the way we think of gender we must unlearn what we naturally learned was the norm.
When my mother was seven years old in the Dominican Republic, she already knew how to cook. Often times she cooked arroz con habichuelas for twenty people. As a girl, she was taught that cooking was her duty. Adichie makes an enlightening statement about this in her TED talk. She says,
I know a family that have both a son and a daughter, both of whom are brilliant at school, who are wonderful, lovely children. When the boy is hungry, the parents say to the girl, “Go and cook Indomie noodles for your brother.” Now the daughter doesn’t particularly like to cook Indomie noodles, but she’s a girl, and so she has to. Now what if the parents, from the beginning, taught both the boy and the girl to cook indomie? Cooking, by the way, is a very useful skill for boys to have. I’ve never thought it made sense to leave such a crucial thing, the ability to nourish oneself, in the hands of others.

In my family, my mother does most of the cooking. Because my father works and my mother doesn’t, she’s claimed it to be her responsibility to cook for her family. Granted, my mother is a fantastic cook and she loves cooking for us. I think it’s okay if a woman happens to do more of the “feminine” tasks in a relationship, as long as it’s not treated as her duty as a woman to do so. At first glance, my parent’s marriage may seem conventional like the marriages Streitmatter discusses in his book. But they have one of the most nurturing and supportive relationships I’ve ever seen. My father actively acknowledges that my mother cooks and he thanks her after each meal, knowing that she doesn’t have to cook for us. And she knows this too. On weekends my father sometimes cooks one of the very few meals he does know how to make. He makes an elaborate dinner with lobster and we are all very grateful. He also constantly urges my mother to open up her own restaurant. I think a lot of gender equality has to do with seeing conventionality but not succumbing to its stereotypes-- My mother cooks but my father doesn’t accept her to do so because of her gender. But sometimes I wonder if my mother in fact does feel like cooking is something she needs to do. Adichie says, “We teach girls to shrink themselves, to make themselves smaller. We say to girls, ‘You can have ambition but not too much. You should aim to be successful, but not too successful, otherwise you will threaten the man.” Sometimes when we talk about my mother opening a restaurant, she’s always unsure if it will work out. She says “Restaurants are hard work.” I know this. But I also want her to know that cooking is something she can make a living out of, instead of only applying the skill in a domestic atmosphere. I also know that if anyone is capable to run a business it’s my mother. She is stronger and more passionate than most men I know today. I hope my mother is not afraid of having ambition. And I hope that she will one day find herself more than capable to do something she loves.
Adichie believes we should unlearn gender conventions we were taught at a young age. And we should teach both boys and girls activities that have been mostly acquired by females. A few months ago, I went to dinner with a man. I’m not sure how we came upon the subject, but at one point he asked if I knew how to cook. And I said “Not at all” and he said, “What will you do when you have a husband?” I was completely stunned by his question. It’s not that this man is usually rude, it’s just that he isn’t actively thinking about gender. He grew up to learn that men inherit responsibility while women inherit domesticity. His father owns restaurants around the world, and when it was time for his father to retire, the responsibilities were passed down to him. He will most likely grow up as the provider of his family.
I think we have a lot more work to do in our quest for gender equality. We have to unlearn what we know and we have to teach children differently. We need more women and men like the writers in free-loving revolutionary newspapers to make us active thinkers and question why things are the way they are.